← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./10890/2017allowed

Jiwas Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2017-03-28Mr. Justice Arvind Srivastava2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10890 of 2017 (3) dt.28-03-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.10890 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -92 Year- 2016 Thana -SARAI District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================

1. JIWAS PASWAN Son of Bipat Paswan Resident of Village: Dumari, Police Station- Sarai in the District of Vaishali. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Pradeep Narain Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 28-03-2017 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Sarai Police Station Case No. 92 of 2016, disclosing offences under Sections 420, 406, 409/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner happens to be an Ex-Mukhia, who is of clean antecedent, has falsely been implicated in this case. In fact, the petitioner is nowhere responsible for any irregularity in the MANREGA scheme. Moreover, co-accused, Ranjeet Kumar, has already been granted anticipatory bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 51280 of 2016. Hence, the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10890 of 2017 (3) dt.28-03-2017 petitioner deserves the privilege of anticipatory bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Sarai Police Station Case No. 92 of 2016, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Arvind Srivastava, J) brajesh/- U T