Bilti Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.67004 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-75 Year-2018 Thana- KALUAHI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Bilti Devi Wife of Late Sukhi Paswan Resident of Bharatpatti,P.S. Kaluahi,Distt.-Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ratanakar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Ramchandra Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 06-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Kaluahi P.S. Case No. 75 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Informant has alleged that the marriage of her daughter was solemnized with son of petitioner 10 years ago and from said wedlock two sons were born and on 03.05.2018 at 10.30 PM his son in law informed that her daughter is seriously ill and when she reached matrimonial house of her daughter she was told that her daughter has died by poisoning. Petitioner is mother in law of deceased and there is general and omnibus allegation against the husband and his

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.67004 of 2018(2) dt.06-11-2018 2/2 family members of poisoning the daughter of informant. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Madhubani, in connection with Kaluahi P.S. Case No. 75 of 2018 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T