Jatan Hembram @ Jattan Hembram And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.66441 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -113 Year- 2018 Thana -SANOKHAR District- BHAGALPUR ======================================================

1. Jatan Hembram @ Jattan Hembram Son of Ramdas Hembram Resident of Village-Kajha,P.S. Amdanda,Distt.-Bhagalpur

2. Etwari Hasda @ Etwari Hansada Son of Late Baitka Hansda Resident of Village-Gokulpur,P.S. Amdanda,Distt.-Bhagalpur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjan Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Asha Devi ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 20-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioners seek bail in Sanokhar (Amdanda) P.S. Case No. 113 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 272 and 273/34 of the IPC and Section 30(a), 30(c), 30(d), 34(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. Allegation against the petitioners is of recovery of 55 liters Mahua wine from a hut situated outside the village. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent and they are in custody since 19.07.2018.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.66441 of 2018 (2) dt.20-11-2018 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Second Additional District & Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Excise, Bhagalpur, in connection with Sanokhar (Amdanda) P.S. Case No. 113 of 2018 with following conditions:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioners shall co-operative in the trial and shall be represented on each and every date fixed by the Court.

(3) If the petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners. (S. Kumar, J) sushma/- U T