Chinta Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13615 of 2015 ====================================================== Chinta Devi Wife of Dilip Kumar Singh, resident of village - Arang, P.O. - Badiha, P.S. - Dinara Bhanas O.P., District- Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The District Magistrate, Rohtas.

4.

The District Panchayat Raj Officer, Rohtas.

5.

The Block Development Officer, Dinara Cum Executive Officer, Dianara Panchayat Samiti, Dinara, Rohtas .... .....Respondents 1st Set.

6.

The Stae Election Commission through its Secretary, Sone Bhawan, Bir Chand Patel Path, Patna.

7.

The State Election Commissioner, State Election Commission, Sone Bhawan, Bir Chand Patel Path, Patna.

......Respondent 2nd Set.

8.

Kanahiya Singh, 9.

Ranjan Kumar Singh, 10.

Abhay Kumar Singh, 11.

Krishna Kumar, 12.

Anita Devi, 13.

Kamida Devi, 14.

Jai Prakash Choubey, 15.

Sunita Devi, 16.

Shiv Barta Devi, 17.

Prabhawati Devi, 18.

Usha Devi, 19.

Krishna Rani, 20.

Smt. Nee Singh, 21.

Baijjanti Devi, 22.

Ambika Khatoon, 23.

Santra Devi, 24.

Tetara Devi, 25.

Parwati Devi, 26.

Nirmila devi, 27.

Raudal Ram, 28.

Vijay Prasad Singh,

Patna High Court CWJC No.13615 of 2015(2) dt.22-04-2019 2/2 29.

Kamal Prasad Singh, 30.

Ganga Sagar Pal, 31.

Ayodhaya Sah, 32.

Sanjay Kumar Singh, 33.

Munna Kumar Singh, 34.

Sri Vishwanath Pasi, 35.

Smt. Malti Devi, All members of Dinara Panchayat through the Executive Officer cum BDO Dinara, Dinara, Rohtas.

... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Anshuman Singh- Gp24 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 22-04-2019 A resolution of No Confidence Motion dated 12.08.2015 as contained in Annexure-5 to the writ application has been challenged in the present writ application. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ application.

Learned counsel for the State as well as the State Election Commission are present and submit that this application has become infructuous.

This writ application is dismissed as not pressed. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Rajeev/- U