← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./25148/2023dismiss for nonprosecution

Nanki Devi@ Nanaki Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2025-01-07Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25148 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-55 Year-2022 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Araria ====================================================== NANKI DEVI@ NANAKI DEVI D/O - NARAYAN RISHIDEO RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- PARIHARI, PS- RANIGANJ, DISTT- ARARIA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

DEVI CHAND SAH SON OF LATE PARMESHWAR SAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- PARIHARI, WARD NO. 7, PS- RANIGANJ, DISTTARARIA 3.

YOGENDRA SAH SON OF LATE PARMESHWAR SAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- PARIHARI, WARD NO. 7, PS- RANIGANJ, DISTT- ARARIA 4.

SOMNATH SAH SON OF DEVI CHAND SAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- PARIHARI, WARD NO. 7, PS- RANIGANJ, DISTT- ARARIA 5.

DILIP SAH SON OF YOGENDRA SAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGEPARIHARI, WARD NO. 7, PS- RANIGANJ, DISTT- ARARIA 6.

RANJEET SAH SON OF YOGENDRA SAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGEPARIHARI, WARD NO. 7, PS- RANIGANJ, DISTT- ARARIA 7.

AMRENDRA SAH SON OF MAHENDRA SAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- PARIHARI, WARD NO. 7, PS- RANIGANJ, DISTT- ARARIA 8.

BINOD SAH SON OF LATE BASUDEV SAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGEPARIHARI, WARD NO. 7, PS- RANIGANJ, DISTT- ARARIA 9.

ABADHKISHOR SAH SON OF LATE BASUDEV SAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- PARIHARI, WARD NO. 7, PS- RANIGANJ, DISTT- ARARIA ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Usha Kumari 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 07-01-2025 In this case on 17.10.2024, while issuing notice to Opposite Party No. 2 to 9, the further proceeding was stayed. The same order was passed on 03.12.2024.

2. Despite the grant of interim protection on 17.10.2024, as per the office notes dated 03.01.2025, requisites have not been filed by the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25148 of 2023(4) dt.07-01-2025 2/2

3. The present petition has been preferred for quashing of the order dated 11.11.2022 passed in Complaint (SC/ST) Case No. 55/2022 in which the present complaint petition was dismissed U/s 203 CrPC by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge (SC/ST) Araria.

4. It seems that the petitioner has lost interest in the case.

5. Accordingly, the same is dismissed for non prosecution.

6. The interim orders passed earlier stand vacated.

7. Office to inform the concerned court regarding the present order.

(Rajiv Roy, J) perwez U T