Patna High CourtCR. MISC./14888/2017dismissed

Mukesh Yadav @ Rajesh Kumar @ Rahul Kumar @ Mukesh Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2017-04-06Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.14888 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -362 Year- 2016 Thana -CHHATAPUR District- SUPAUL ======================================================

1. MUKESH YADAV @ RAJESH KUMAR @ RAHUL KUMAR @ MUKESH KUMAR, S/o Yogendra Prasad Yadav, resident of MohallaSant Nagar, P.S.- Sharasa, District- Saharsa.

2. Bipin Kumar, S/o Late Parmeshwari Prasad Yadav, resident of MohallaJarsein, P.S.- Saharsa, District- Saharsa.

3. Ajay Kumar, S/o Laxmi Yadav, resident of Mohalla- Gokul Chauk, Ward No. 18, P.S.- Saharsa, District- Saharsa. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhaskar Shankar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Jagdhar Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 06-04-2017 The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Chatapur P.S. Case No. 362 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Sections 365, 366, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

There is allegation against these petitioners that they kidnapped the mother of the informant from her house. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the statement of the victim is contradictory to the written statement filed by the informant and petitioner no.1 is husband of the daughter of the informant and they are falsely implicated in this case

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14888 of 2017 (2) dt.06-04-2017 2/2 Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sided and in view of the facts that the name of the petitioners has been mentioned in the FIR except petitioner no.3 and even the victim girl has named the petitioner in her statement recorded under section 164 as kidnapper and also some other allegations and also considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected.

The petitioners are directed to surrender before the court below and make prayer for regular bail. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Ravi/- U T