Punit Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.40938 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -205 Year- 2014 Thana -LAXMIPUR District- JAMUI ======================================================

1. Punit Yadav Son of Fuleshwar Yadav Resident of village - Chinberia, Police Station Laxmipur, District - Jamui .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Poonam Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Dashrath Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 26-10-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer of bail, which was earlier rejected vide order dated 29.02.2016 passed in Cri. Misc. No. 45884 of 2015, on the ground that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 28.01.2015, having no criminal antecedent, post mortem report does not support the prosecution version as the injury caused have been noticed by hard and blunt substance, there is case and counter case as, as a matter of fact, the deceased died as he was not treated properly to which learned A.P.P. opposes by submitting that that the petitioner is the assailant.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, finding no good ground for reconsideration of prayer of bail, again prayer of bail of the petitioner stands rejected.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40938 of 2016 (4) dt.26-10-2016 2/2 However, considering the period of detention the trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same as early as possible, preferably within six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, failing which the petitioner, if at no fault, may renew his prayer for bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) siddharth/-avin U T