M/S Jai Mangla Steels Pvt. Ltd. v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 6158 of 2020 ========================================================================== M/s. Jai Mangla Steels Pvt. Ltd., a Company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 having its Registered Office at B-32, Jagat Apartment, Baily Road, Patna, through its Director, namely, Ajay Kumar, aged about 58 years, Male, Son of Late Bacheshwar Prasad Singh, Resident of Ward No. 23, ri Krishna Nagar, Begusarai, P.S. Begusarai Sadar, Distt.-Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Main Secretariat, Patna

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Energy, Main Secretariat, Patna.

3. The Principal Secretary, Department of Industries, Government of Bihar, Vikash Bhavan, Bailey Road, Patna.

4. The Bihar State Power Holding Company Limited through its Chairman cum Managing Director, Vidyut Bhavan, Bailey Road, Patna.

5. The North Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd. through its Managing Director, 2nd Floor, Vidyut Bhavan, Bailey Road, Patna.

6. The Chief Engineer - Commercial, North Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd. 2nd Floor, Vidyut Bhavan, Bailey Road, Patna.

7. The General Manager Finance & Accounts, North Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd. 2nd Floor, Vidyut Bhavan, Bailey Road, Patna.

... ... Opposite Party/s-Respondents ========================================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mohit Agarwal, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Umesh Prasad Singh, Sr. Advocate Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh, Sr. Advocate For the State : Mr. Kinkar Kumar, Advocate =========================================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 19-08-2020 Mr. Mohit Agarwal, learned Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Umesh Prasad Singh, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh, learned Senior Advocate for the respondent Power Holding Company and Mr. Kinkar Kumar, learned Advocate for the State have unanimously informed this Court that in view of the policy decision taken

by the State Government with regard to revision of the electricity bills for the month of April, 2020, the present writ petition has become infructuous. The writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. (Ashutosh Kumar, J) krishna/- U T