← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./20251/2025bail granted

Sachin Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-04-04Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20251 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-932 Year-2024 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Sachin Kumar S/O Kailash Sah R/O Village- Gunkole, P.S- Amarpur, Distt.- Banka.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rahul Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 04-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Excise (Sadar) P.S. Case No. 932 of 2024 instituted for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that total 568.800 litres of liquor was recovered from truck and two autorickshaw out of which 112.3 litres of liquor has been recovered from the vehicle of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20251 of 2025(2) dt.04-04-2025 2/2 possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that the name of the petitioner has transpired in this case merely because he happens to be the owner of the vehicle and he had no knowledge regarding the goods loaded in the vehicle. The petitioner is in custody since 19.02.2025 and has one criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Excise (Sadar) P.S. Case No. 932 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T