Amresh Mall v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7732 of 2009 ====================================================== Amresh Mall son of Late Ganga Mall, resident of village- Dumra, P.S. & Anchal Lauria, District- West Champaran (Bettiah) at present Ward No. 16, P.O. Narkatiaganj, P.S. Shikarpur, District West Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Collector, West Champaran (Bettiah)

3. Dy. Collector Land Reforms, Narkatiaganj, West Champaran (Bettiah)

4. Anchal Adhikari, Lauria, P.S. Lauria, District West Champaran (Bettiah)

5. Raghunath Mall, son of Late Ganga Mall, resident of village Dumra, P.S. & Anchal- Lauria, District West Champaran (Bettiah) .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None. For the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 : Mr. Raj Ballabh Prasad Yadav, AAG-11 Mr. Jitendra Kumar, AC to AAG-11 For the Respondent Nos. 6 : Mr. U.C. Verma, Adv. Mr. S.K. Thakur, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 21-11-2016 Despite repeated calls, none appears on behalf of the petitioner in support of the present writ petition, though the name of the learned counsel appearing on his behalf is printed in the daily cause list.

The learned AAG-11, appearing on behalf of the official respondents as also the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the private respondent, on the other hand, submit that the order impugned cannot be legally faulted.

Be that as it may, since none is appearing on behalf of the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.

(Birendra Prasad Verma, J) BTiwary/- U