Satyam Kumar @ Angad Kumar @ Angad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22107 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-106 Year-2025 Thana- Narhiya District- Madhubani ====================================================== Satyam Kumar @ Angad Kumar @ Angad Son of Vinod Kumar Roy @ Vinod Rai Resident of Village- Jhitaki @ Jhitki, P.S.- Narahia, DistrictMadhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jitendra Kumar Bharti, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 08-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Narhia P.S. Case No. 106/2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 303(2), 329(4), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of B.N.S. and Section 27 of Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, petitioner and others had gone to purchase cigarettes, they wanted a discount of Rs. one on purchase of the cigarette and when the informant refused, they assaulted the informant and fired on his ear.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in the case. Learned counsel further submits that he has five criminal antecedents

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22107 of 2026(2) dt.08-04-2026 2/2 and he is in custody since 25.11.2025. The petitioner undertakes to co-operate in the case/ trial.

5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner..

6. Considering the allegation levelled against the petitioner and the criminal antecedent, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed. (Sandeep Kumar, J) tusharika/- U T