Patna High CourtCR. MISC./19784/2020bail granted

Bhula Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

2020-10-14Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19784 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-546 Year-2019 Thana- GARKHA District- Saran ====================================================== Bhula Mahto, S/o Bashishth Mahto @ Vashishth Mahto, Resident of VillageNarikhurd, P.S.- Tisiouta, District- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ram Shankar Das, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs.Renu Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 14-10-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In the present case, the petitioner is seeking bail in Garkha P.S. Case No. 546 of 2019, registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the co-accused including the petitioner is to have snatched a bag containing Rs. 1,05,000/- from the informant. The petitioner has been apprehended from the spot, however, counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing has been recovered from his possession and he is in judicial custody since 19.11.2019. It is claimed in paragraph 3 that his antecedent is clean.

Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19784 of 2020(3) dt.14-10-2020 2/2 bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-XIV, Saran at Chapra in connection with Garkha P.S. Case No. 546 of 2019 with a condition that whenever the police will call the petitioner for the purposes of investigation and interrogation, he will remain present for such purpose. In the event of being absent on two consecutive dates without reasonable explanation, the present order will be treated to have been cancelled and a further condition that if the petitioner, after his release in this case, is again found involved in similar nature of cases then the concerned court would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bond (Shivaji Pandey, J) V.K.Pandey/- U T