Satyendra Puri v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30038 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-339 Year-2023 Thana- JALALPUR District- Saran ====================================================== 1.
Satyendra Puri Son of Late Sudish Puri Resident of Sawari Puri Tola, P.S.- Jalalpur, Dist.- Saran 2.
Hemant Puri Son of Satyendra Puri Resident of Sawari Puri Tola, P.S.- Jalalpur, Dist.- Saran 3.
Pramod Puri Son of Late Sudish Puri Resident of Sawari Puri Tola, P.S.- Jalalpur, Dist.- Saran 4.
Balwant Puri Son of Satyendra Puri Resident of Sawari Puri Tola, P.S.- Jalalpur, Dist.- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Mirtunjay Kumar Tiwary, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-06-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Jalalpur P.S. Case No. 339 of 2023 registered under Sections 341, 323, 354B, 307, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per prosecution case, on 25.12.2023, all the FIR named accused persons including these petitioners came to house of the informant and assaulted the informant and his family members due to which they sustained injuries.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30038 of 2024(3) dt.20-06-2024 2/3 submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case due to ill motive. Both parties are co-villager. In fact, the informant in state of intoxication came to the house of the petitioners and started abusing in filthy language. On protest, scuffle took place. Due to this, the informant filed the instant case with false and absurd allegation. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. Petitioners have got clean antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of petitioners no. 3 and 4 by contending that the injuries caused by these petitioners are grievous in nature. Hence, they do not deserve the privilege of anticipatory bail.
6. Considering the nature of injury allegedly caused by petitioners no. 3 and 4, their prayer for anticipatory bail is, accordingly, rejected.
7. So far as petitioners no. 1 and 2 are concerned, since they have caused simple injury, let petitioners no. 1 and 2 be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000 (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-XIII, Saran at Chapra in
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30038 of 2024(3) dt.20-06-2024 3/3 connection with Jalalpur P.S. Case No. 339 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) utkarsh/- U T