← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./22143/2026dismissed

Rajeshwar Dubey @ Rajeshwar Duve v. The State Of Bihar

2026-04-30Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22143 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-447 Year-2024 Thana- ADAPUR District- East Champaran ====================================================== Rajeshwar Dubey @ Rajeshwar Duve S/o- Late Amarnath Dubey R/vLatiyahi Ps- Aadapur District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Gulnar Begum, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 30-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. This is the second attempt of the petitioner for grant of regular bail in connection with Adapur P.S. Case No. 447/2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 20(b)(ii)(B), 23(C ) and 25 of N.D.P.S. Act. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 11.09.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 37412 of 2025.

3. As per the prosecution case, 13.345 kg of ganja has been recovered from the house of the petitioner and he is in custody since 28.12.2024.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in the case. No incriminating articles has been recovered from his possession.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22143 of 2026(2) dt.30-04-2026 2/2 Learned counsel further submits that in the trial only two witnesses have been examined and he has seven criminal antecedents. The petitioner undertakes to co-operate in the case/ trial.

5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the gravity of the offence, this Court is not inclined to review its earlier order.

7. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed again and the trial court is directed to expedite the trial. (Sandeep Kumar, J) tusharika/- U T