Nageshwar Prasad And ORS v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2567 of 1999 ===========================================================
1. Nageshwar Prasad, son of Shri Baba Prasad Singh, resident of villageAnandpura, P.S. Nawadaha, District-Nawadaha, present posted as Night Guard, Biscomaun, Head Office, Gandhimaidan, Patna.
2. Janardan Prasad, son of Shri Ram Lakhan Prasad, resident of Rampur, P.S. Chandi, District-Nawadaha, presently posted as Night Guard, BISCOMAUN Head office, Ganghimaidan, Patna.
3. Pradeep Ram, son of Shri Sukho Ram, resident of village Sandulpur, P.S. Alamganj, District-Patna.
Night Guard, Biscomaun Head Office, Gandhimaidan, Patna.
4. Umesh Singh Yadav, son of late Bisheshwar Yadav, resident of village Kala Diyara, P.s.-Bakhtiyarpur, District-Patna, present Watch man, BISCOMAUN Head Office, Gandhimaidan, Patna.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. State of Bihar represented through Registrar of Cooperative, New Secretariat, Patna.
2. Shri Mantreshwar Jha, the Administrator, BISCOMAUN (Head Office), West Gandhimaidan, Patna.
.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ishwari Singh, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 05-07-2017 From the show cause filed by the respondents, we see that the claim of the petitioners has been settled and the amount has been paid to them as is evident from the documents filed as Annexure-A series. In view of the above, now no further action is required to be taken in the matter. In case, the petitioners have any grievance with regard to the payment made or it is their case that they are entitled to interest on delayed payment, liberty shall be available to the petitioners to claim the same afresh in accordance with law.
Patna High Court MJC No.2567 of 1999 dt.05-07-2017 2/2 In view of the compliance reported by the respondents, now no further action is required to be taken in the matter. The application is, accordingly, disposed of with the aforesaid liberty to the petitioners. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) Sunil/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 07.07.2017 Transmission Date