← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/5372/2023disposed

Md. Mumtaz Ahmad v. The State Of Bihar

2026-06-23Mr. Justice Harish Kumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5372 of 2023 ====================================================== 1.

Md. Mumtaz Ahmad Son of Late A. Rahuu, Resident of Mohalla-Kumhar gali, Old Karimganj, P.S.-Rampur Gaya, District-Gaya. 2.

Madhuri Devi Wife of Late Mohan Ram Resident of Mohalla-Bapu Nagar, Bhalua, P.S.-Bodh Gaya, District-Gaya.

3.

M. Taqui Hasan Mallick Son of Late Md. Aziz Ahsan Resident of 27/263 Road NO. 16/A Aliganj Near Aryan Public School Gaya,-Rampur Gaya, District-Gaya.

4.

Chandar Ram Son of Late Kesho Ram Resident of Mohalla-Turi Kala, Zindapur, P.S.-Bodh Gaya, District-Gaya.

5.

Raj Kumari Devi Wife of Late Badho Rajak Resident of Village-Mocharim, P.S.-Bodh Gaya, District-Gaya.

6.

Amrendra Kumar Son of Late Krishna Nandan Sahay, Resident of MohallaT/32 Magadh University, P.S.-Magadh University, District-Gaya. 7.

Braj Kishore Mistri Son of Late Somar Mistry Resident of Village-Kolhaura, P.S.-Bodh Gaya, District-Gaya.

8.

Mala Devi Wife olf Late Ram Vilas Singh Resident of Village-BHagwanpur, P.S.-Bodh Gaya, District-Gaya.

9.

Pradeep Kumar Son of Late Ram Kishan Yadav Resident of MohallaChirayantand Laxmi Nagar, Jail Road Gaya, P.S.-Rampur Gaya, DistrictGaya. 10.

Tulsi Ravidas Son of Late Chaturi Ravidas, Resident of Village-Kolhaura, P.S.-Bodh Gaya, District-Gaya.

11.

Ramsiya Podar Son of Late Ram Swaroop Poddar Resident of VillageBapunagar Bhalua, P.S.-Bodh Gaya, District-Gaya. 12.

Kishori Ram Son of Late Badri Ram Resident of Mohalla-Back Side of Karlo Agency, Bodh Gaya, Domuhan, P.S.-Bodh Gaya, District-Gaya. 13.

Manju Devi Son of Late Mohan Prasad Resident of Mohalla-Dhrub Diha, P.S.-Bishnubad Bodh Gaya, District-Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Additinal Chief Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya 4.

The Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya 5.

The Finance Officer, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

Patna High Court CWJC No.5372 of 2023 dt.23-06-2026 2/3 For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar No.1, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Madan Jeet Kumar, GP-20 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 23-06-2026 Learned Advocate for the respective parties are present.

2. The petitioners, who are retired employees/their dependents, have approached this Court seeking a direction upon the respondent authorities for following reliefs:- "(i) To pay due amount of gratuity and arrear of difference of pension as per recommendation of 7th pay Revision Commission Report which has been accepted by the Government w.e.f.

01.01.2016 and given monetary benefits from 01.04.2017.

(ii) To pay arrear of difference of D.A. (Dearness allowance) for the period 01.01.2022 to 30.09.2022 (iii) To pay medical allowance due Rs. 800/- (Eight Hundred) per month as per enhancement.

(iv) To pay arrear of salary as per promotion in ACP/MACP scale.

(v) To pay all the due amount with interest @ 18 % per annum compound for delay payment.

(vi) To grant other relief/reliefs for which the petitioner is entitle."

3. Learned Advocate for the University drawing the attention of this Court to paragraph no. 4 of the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the University dated 19.02.2024 submitted

Patna High Court CWJC No.5372 of 2023 dt.23-06-2026 3/3 that all the outstanding retiral benefits have already been paid to the petitioner and a chart with respect to the payments in different heads have been duly mentioned in paragraph no. 4 of the counter affidavit.

4. So far the claim with regard to medical allowance and the benefit of ACP/MACP are concerned, that was found to be baseless and inadmissible.

5. In view of the categorical averments made in the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the University, the present writ petition stands disposed off.

(Harish Kumar, J) shivank/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 24.06.2026 Transmission Date NA