Tribhuwan Prasad Gupta v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23090 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-546 Year-2024 Thana- MAHUA District- Vaishali ====================================================== Tribhuwan Prasad Gupta Son of Late Chandrika Pd. Gupta Resident of Village -Mahua Mukundpur PS -Mahua, Dist- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pradeep Narain Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 01-05-2025 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with Mahua P.S. Case No. 546 of 2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 461 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code. 3.

The learned APP, at the outset, submits that the offences for which the instant FIR has been instituted, carries punishment of seven years and less, the said submission of the learned APP is not disputed by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.

4.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that investigation in the case against the petitioner is continuing but then the petitioner has not been given notice under Section 41(1) (b) of the Cr.P.C, on which the learned APP submits that the case be disposed of in terms of the order dated 13-2-2024 passed in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23090 of 2025(2) dt.01-05-2025 2/2 Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. the State of Bihar).

5.

In view of the submission made by the learned APP, the anticipatory bail application is disposed of in terms of the order dated 13-2-2024 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. the State of Bihar). 6.

The petitioner would be at liberty to file a representation before the concerned Superintendent of Police and the Investigating Officer of the case, within a period of three weeks from today, with a web copy of the order dated 13-2-2024 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. the state of Bihar); and the concerned Superintendent of Police shall ensure that the Investigating Officer of the case strictly adheres to the directions contained in the order dated 13-2-2024 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. the State of Bihar).

7.

Let a copy of this order be sent to the learned Additional Sessions Judge-XIII, Vaishali at Hajipur, for his perusal.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T