Jitendra Kumar Yadav v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.68384 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1196 Year-2011 Thana- NALANDA COMPLAINT CASE District- Nalanda ====================================================== Jitendra Kumar Yadav, S/o Dinesh Yadav, Resident of Village- Pathra English, P.S. Muffasil, District- Nawada.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Parmila Devi, D/o Sakaldeep Yadav, Resident of Village- Nursarai Tola Sohsarai, P.S.- Nursarai, District- Nalanda at Biharsharif. ... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad, Advocate.

For the State :

Smt. Rita Verma, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-11-2018 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary corrections in prayer portion of the bail application, in course of the day.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in case for the offence registered under Sections 323, 379, 494,498(A) of the IPC in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 498(A) and 494 of the IPC.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that the accused persons including the petitioner tortured the victim due to nonfulfilment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.68384 of 2018(2) dt.19-11-2018 2/2 There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the learned counsel for the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R./Complaint Case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M. Nalanda at Biharsharif, in connection with Complaint Case No. 1196/2011, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T