Ranjeet Yadav @ Ranjit Kumar @ Shiv Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20817 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-513 Year-2025 Thana- PHULPARAS District- Madhubani ====================================================== Ranjeet Yadav @ Ranjit Kumar @ Shiv Kumar S/O Bechan Yadav @ Bechan Kumar Yadav R/o village - Dhanauja , P.S.- Phulparas , District - Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ravi Prakash, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Murli Dhar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 02-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Phulparas P.S. Case No.513 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 329(4), 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 352, 351(2) & 3(5) of the BNS and under Sections 25(1b)a, 26, 35 & 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that in family dispute the petitioner has fired but nobody has received no injury. A country made pistol and two live cartridges were recovered.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner. Learned counsel for the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20817 of 2026(2) dt.02-04-2026 2/2 petitioner has further submitted that the witnesses of the seizure list are police personnel and police have not complied Section 105 of the BNSS while making seizure. Moreover, nobody has received any injury. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the petitioner has been framed in this case due to family dispute. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 18.12.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State. Learned APP has further stated that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of five cases.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court of learned A.C.J.M.-II, Jhanjharpur in connection with Phulparas P.S. Case No.513 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) durgesh/- U T