Patna High CourtMJC/22/2014withdrawn

M/S Bikaner Assam Road Lines Ltd. And ANR. v. The Union Of India And ORS

2016-11-16Mr. Justice Ramesh Kumar Datta1 pages

Patna High Court MJC No.22 of 2014 (4) dt.16-11-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.22 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 1271 of 2013 ======================================================

1. M/s. Bikaner Assam Road Lines India Ltd., through its authorised signatory Hira Kant Jha S/o Late Ram Sharan Jha Resident of House No. 125, Shakti Garh, Road No. 5, P.S- Silliguri, District- Darzilling ( West Bengal)

2. M/s. Karni Trading Company, through its proprietor Shanti Lal Bhansali S/o Rewat Mal Bhansali Resident of Marwari Patti, P.S- Alipur Dwar, District- Jalpaiguri ( West Bengal) .... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The Union of India through Additional Director General, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, Zonal Units, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, namely Smt. Suchitra Sharma, Husband's name not known to the petitioners.

2. The Commissioner ( Appeals), Custom, Central Excise & Service Tax, Central Revenue Building Birchand Patel Path, Patna, namely Sri Ram Chandra Sankhla, S/o not known to the petitioners

3. The Additional Director, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, Regional Unit, Patna, namely Sri Vidyut Vikas S/o not known to the petitioners

4. The Commissioner of Customs, 4th Floor, Central Revenue Building, Bir Chand Patel Path, Patna, namely Sri Kishori Lal S/o not known to the petitioners

5. The Additional Commissioner cum Adjudicating Authority, Central Revenue, Building, Bir Chand Patel Path, Patna, namely Sri Akhilesh Kumar, S/o not known to the petitioners

6. The Intelligence Officer cum Seizing Officer, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, Sub Regional Unit, Muzaffarpur, Bihar, namely, Sri Rajesh Kumar, s/o not known to the petitioners .... .... Opp. Parties ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA ORAL ORDER 16-11-2016 Mr. Prabhat Ranjan, learned counsel for the petitioners, seeks permission to withdraw the contempt application stating that the opposite party has passed the final order in the matter and the petitioners may be given liberty to challenge the same, if so advised.

The contempt application is, accordingly, dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty as sought. (Ramesh Kumar Datta, J) spal/- U