← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./21875/2022bail granted

Pinko Mandal @ Pinku Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

2022-11-03Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21875 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-113 Year-2021 Thana- CHAUSA District- Madhepura ====================================================== Pinko Mandal @ Pinku Mandal, Son Of Ambika Mandal Resident Of Village - Dimha Parbatta, Ward No.13, P.S.- Chausa, Distt.- Madhepura. ... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Uday Chand Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 03-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 448, 379, 504 and 506/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is alleged to have assaulted Haldhar Sharma by an iron rod causing injury on head on account of land dispute.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is next submitted that there is land dispute between the parties on account of which, the occurrence took place in which even the petitioner was assaulted. It is next submitted that even

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21875 of 2022(2) dt.03-11-2022 2/2 presuming what has been alleged is true without admitting for the purposes of anticipatory bail, then the injuries suffered by the informant is simple in nature as would be evident from Annexure-3 series to the anticipatory bail application which prima facie demonstrates that petitioner never had any intention to commit a serious offence.

Learned A.P.P. opposes the bail application.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Chausa P. S. Case No.113 of 2021, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T