← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/806/2026allowed

Vinay Krishna Singh @ Vinay Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2026-07-03Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.806 of 2026 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21479 of 2018 ====================================================== Vinay Krishna Singh @ Vinay Kumar Singh Son of Late Ram Nandan Singh, resident of Village Ashok Nagar Pokhariya, P.S.-Nagar, District-Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Through Nagar Vikash Secretary, Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Nagar Aayukta, Nagar Nigam, Begusarai, District-Begusarai. 3.

The Upper Nagar Aayukta Nagar Nigam Begusarai, District-Begusarai. 4.

The District Magistrate, Begusarai.

5.

The Executive Officer, Nagar Parishad, Begusarai Municipality, District Begusarai.

6.

The Superintendent of Police, Begusarai.

7.

The Sub Divisional Officer, Begusarai.

8.

The S.H.O. Begusarai, Town P.S., District-Begusarai. 9.

Ajay Shanker Singh, S/o Late Ram Balak Singh, Resident of Village Mohanpur, P.S. Muffasil, District-Begusarai, at present residing at Ashok Nagar, Pokharia, Ward No. 30, P.S. Town, District-Begusarai. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sabal Kumar Jha, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Yogendra Pd. Sinha, AAG 7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 03-07-2026 Heard the parties.

2. CWJC No. 21479 of 2018 was dismissed for nonprosecution on 02.07.2025 for the reasons as stated in the said order.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Mr. Jai Prakash Singh, learned Advocate used to represent the petitioner of the writ application but unfortunately, he was

Patna High Court MJC No.806 of 2026(4) dt.03-07-2026 2/2 suffering from Cancer, which ultimately led to his death on 25.01.2026. It is due to this reason that he was unable to be personally present to prosecute the writ application. Learned counsel for the petitioner, therefore, prays that CWJC No. 21479 of 2018 be restored to its original file.

4. Learned counsel for the opposite party-State does not oppose the prayer for restoration.

5. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this application is allowed and CWJC No. 21479 of 2018 is directed to be restored to its original file.

6. Put up CWJC No. 21479 of 2018 after two weeks of restoration under appropriate heading.

(Alok Kumar Sinha, J) kiran/- U