← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./68680/2018bail granted

Binod Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

2018-12-12Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.68680 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-146 Year-2014 Thana- CHIRAIYA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Binod Prasad Son of Sri Babulal Prasad @ Babulal Mahto, resident of Village- Senwariya, P.S. Chiraiya, District- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party :

APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 12-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. This is the third attempt on behalf of the petitioner, who is in custody since 19.10.2017 and has renewed his prayer for bail in connection with Chiraiya P.S. Case No. 146 of 2014 for the offence alleged under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 472 of the Indian Penal Code having twice been rejected by orders dated 17.01.2018 and 24.08.2018 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2243 of 2018 and Criminal Miscellaneous No. 44650 of 2018, respectively with an observation that the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after completion of one year in custody.

3. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case and having regard to the period of custody already suffered since 19.10.2017, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.68680 of 2018(2) dt.12-12-2018 2/2 thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sikrahana, Dhaka, District- East Champaran, in connection with Chiraiya P.S. Case No. 146 of 2014, on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Ibrar/BT U