Ambika Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20452 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-177 Year-2025 Thana- BARHAT District- Jamui ====================================================== Ambika Yadav Son of Masudan Yadav @ Madhusudan Yadav Resident of Village- Jorwaha Dharampur, P.S.- Khaira, District- Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Mala Sinha, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Murli Dhar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 26-03-2026 Heard Ms. Mala Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Murli Dhar, learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 19.12.2025, in connection with Barhat P.S. Case No. 177 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 13.12.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. Allegation against the petitioner is that he along with others attempted to kill the informant's brother by slitting his throat from knife.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. She further submits that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and the name of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20452 of 2026(2) dt.26-03-2026 2/3 petitioner has been transpired during investigation on the basis of restatement of the informant and his brother namely Tripurari Rawat. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that it has come during investigation that co-accused Ram Yadav has taken Rs. 4,00,000/- (Four Lakh) loan from the injured person, namely, Vinod Yadav and he has refused to pay the same and for this reason, co-accused person has assaulted to the brother of the informant and petitioner was present at the place of occurrence. The petitioner is in custody since 19.12.2025.

5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in connection with Barhat P.S. Case No. 177 of 2025, subject to the following conditions :-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20452 of 2026(2) dt.26-03-2026 3/3 on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(3) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ibrar//- U T