← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/19063/2010dismissed

Krishna Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS '

2015-01-09Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19063 of 2010 ======================================================

1. Krishna Kumar Singh S/O Pramod Singh R/O Vill.- Barnaon, Post Barnaon, P.S.- Arer, Distt.- Bhojpur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. Principal Secretary Department Of Human Resource Development, Government Of Bihar, Patna

3. Bihar School Examination Board, Through Its Secretary, Patna

4. Principal, Indu Tapeshwar Singh Mahila College, Bikramganj, Distt.- Rohtas

5. Managing Committee, Through Its Secretary Indu Tapeshwar Singh Women College, Bikramganj, Distt.- Rohtas .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jitendra Pd.Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Tej Bahadur Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 09-01-2015 Heard Mr. Jitendra Prasad Singh who has appeared on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Tej Bahadur Singh who has appeared on behalf of respondent no. 4.

A preliminary objection has been raised by the respondents that the writ application seeking relief against the Managing Committee of Indu Tapeshwar Singh Mahila College, Bikramganj, Rohtas is not maintainable. He relies in this regard on two orders passed in respect of the same College copies whereof have been handed in by Mr. Tej Bahadur Singh which have been taken on record and marked 'X' and 'Y' for identification. He also relies on a Full Bench judgment of this Court since reported in 1987

Patna High Court CWJC No.19063 of 2010 (3) dt.09-01-2015 P.L.J.R. 964.

Mr. Singh, Counsel for the petitioner, after making some submissions, states that the petitioner, instead of pressing this application, would approach once again the respondent Principal Secretary, Government of Bihar for redressal of his grievance.

The writ application is dismissed as not pressed with the liberty aforesaid.

(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) Pankaj/- U