Veena Devi @ Veena Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23272 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-134 Year-2025 Thana- JAHANABAD District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Veena Devi @ Veena Kumari wife of Ranjay Kumar Resident of VillageErki, P.S. and District- Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Mohammad Sufyan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 17-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in connection with Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 134 of 2025 in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 3(5) of the BNS.

3. As per the prosecution story, on 17.02.2025, the petitioner and co-accused Dheeraj Kumar allegedly intercepted the informant's father and assaulted him with a lathi, rod, and basula, as a result of which he sustained a fractured left leg and multiple injuries.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it appears from the First Information Report that there are general and omnibus allegations against the petitioner, and the specific allegation of assault causing grievous injury is attributed to one Dheeraj Kumar, however, the same is also on a non-vital part of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23272 of 2026(2) dt.17-04-2026 2/2 body. It is further submitted that there is a case and counter-case between the parties, and the petitioner, being a lady with no criminal antecedent, has been falsely implicated in the present case.

5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the application for anticipatory bail.

6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances and also considering the general and omnibus nature of allegation coupled with the fact that the petitioner is a lady having no criminal antecedent, let the above named petitioner, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 134 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the B.N.S.S. (Soni Shrivastava, J) priyanka/- U T