Sunil Kahar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20472 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1 Year-2026 Thana- KUDHNI District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== Sunil Kahar Son of Dinesh Kahar Resident of Village- Chandesh, P.S.- Kudhani, District- Kaimur at Bhabua ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Parwej Khan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Bharat Bhushan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 01-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Kudhani P.S. Case No. 01 of 2026, instituted under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 352, 351(2) & 351(3) of the B.N.S.
3. As per the prosecution case, on the date of occurrence, children of the informant were playing with the children of the petitioner. Suddenly, they started quarreling. Thereafter, petitioner came and assaulted the children of the informant causing injuries to them. When the informant came to save, petitioner also assaulted her causing head injury.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20472 of 2026(3) dt.01-07-2026 2/3 case due to ulterior motives. There was dispute between the children due to which fight took place between them. Both parties are agnates. Children of the informant themselves received injuries when they were fleeing away towards house after assaulting the daughter of the petitioner and fell down on the road and taking advantage of the same, informant filed case against the petitioner. Petitioner has no concern with the alleged occurrence as he was not present at the place of occurrence. Injuries to the injured are simple in nature, except one injury to the daughter of the informant which is not on the vital part of body. The same is not caused by the petitioner. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent. He undertakes to co-operate in the investigation and trial.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submission of learned counsel for the parties and clean antecedent of the petitioner, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20472 of 2026(3) dt.01-07-2026 3/3 Magistrate, Mohania, Kaimur at Bhabhua in connection with Kudhani P.S. Case No. 01 of 2026, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.S.), 2023.
(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) rakhi/- U T