← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/9079/2020disposed

Arun Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2023-03-29Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9079 of 2020 ====================================================== 1.

Arun Kumar Yadav son of Maheshwari Yadav resident of Mohalla- Jadia, Ward No. 13, P.S.- Jadia, District- Supaul.

2.

Sonu Kumar son of Mithlesh Kumar Singh resident of Mohallah- Jainagar, P.S.- Bhargama, District- Araria.

3.

Ramji Sah son of Saligram Sah resident of Mohalla- Triveniganj, P.S.- Triveniganj, District- Supaul.

4.

Sitaram Mahta son of Hakar Mehta resident of Mohallah- Chauraha Maura Jharkaha, Ward No. 10, P.S.- Shankarpur, District- Madhepura. 5.

Neha Thakur D/o Ashok Thakur resident of Mohalla- Sour Bazar, P.S.- Sour Bazar, District- Saharsa.

6.

Bharti Kumari wife of Bhagwan Kishan Das resident of Mohalla- Shivpuri, P.S.- Araria, District- Araria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Finance Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Director, Secondary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 5.

The District Education Officer, Araria.

6.

The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Araria. 7.

The District Officer, Information and Science, Araria. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vipin Kumar For the Respondent/s :

A.C. to S.C. 28 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 29-03-2023 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the case of the petitioners is fully covered by the judgment dated 13 / 04 / 2022 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 23 of 2020 ( Annexure - 9 to the supplementary affidavit).

Patna High Court CWJC No.9079 of 2020(6) dt.29-03-2023 2/2 Learned counsel for the State is not in a position to controvert the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioners.

Accordingly, this writ application is disposed of exactly in terms of the order dated 13 / 04 / 2022 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 23 of 2020.

Resultantly, the impugned order at Annexure- 6 to the writ application is quashed.

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J) praful/- U