Vijay Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.67972 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-259 Year-2018 Thana- GAUTAMBUDHNAGAR DistrictSiwan ====================================================== Vijay Prasad Son of Late Gulab Chand Prasad, Resident of VillageDindayalpur, P.S. G.B. Nagar, District- Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ramadhar Shekhar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Smt. Nirmala Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 28-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with G.B. Nagar P.S. Case No. 259 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 413, 414,34 of the Indian Penal.

Informant has alleged recovery of stolen motorcycle from the house of petitioner.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that motorcycle does not belong to petitioner and it was kept by one co-accused Upendra Paswan and petitioner was not aware that motorcycle was stolen one. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 11.08.2018.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.67972 of 2018(2) dt.28-11-2018 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan, in connection with G.B. Nagar P.S. Case No. 259 of 2018 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T