Jamshed Alam @ Md. Jamshed Alam v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21275 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-432 Year-2025 Thana- AMAUR District- Purnia ====================================================== 1.
Jamshed Alam @ Md. Jamshed Alam 2.
Md. Parvej Alam @ Md. Parwez Alam Both S/O Hasibur Rahaman @ Md Hasiburrehaman Res Of Village - Parasrai, ward no.- 4, P.S- Amour, District- Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. N. K. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate Mr.Bidhu Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Shailendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 16-04-2026 Heard Mr. N. K. Agrawal, learned Senior Counsel along with Mr. Bidhu Ranjan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners seek pre-arrest bail in connection with Amour P.S. Case No. 432/2025 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2), 76,352,351(2),352,3(5), of the BNS.
3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, the accused persons named therein including the petitioners assaulted the informant, with an intention to kill, causing injuries. When the family members of the informant came to his rescue, the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21275 of 2026(2) dt.16-04-2026 2/3 accused persons also assaulted them.
4. Learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. Petitioners and informant are own brother. There is case and counter case between the parties arising out of same incidence and due to land dispute, an altercation took place and both the sides entered into fierce fight and in the self-defence, petitioners may have caused some injury on the persons of the informant and his family members without intention.
5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.
6. Having heard the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, as well as, having perused the allegation made in the FIR and the fact that there is case and counter case between the parties arising out of same incidence and due to land dispute, an altercation took place and both the sides entered into fierce fight and in the self-defence, petitioners may have caused some injury on the persons of the informant and his family members without intention, I am of the opinion that petitioners have, prima facie, made out a case to be released on pre-arrest bail.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21275 of 2026(2) dt.16-04-2026 3/3
7. The petitioners, above named, are directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned District Court within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Purnea / Concerned Court in connection with Amour P.S. Case No. 432/2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
8. The learned District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and if it is found that the petitioners are involved in some other cases, as what has been stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail application, this order will automatically lose its force.
(Purnendu Singh, J) Sanjay/- U T