Md. Reyazuddin And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.14821 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -148 Year- 2015 Thana -BARURAJ District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================
1. Md. Reyazuddin, son of Shakoor Miyan,
2. Buchcha Ansari, son of Hanif Miyan,
3. Akhtar Miyan, son of Md. Anwar,
4. Md. Soaib, son of Rafique Miyan, All are resident of Village- Parsauni Nath, P.S.- Baruraj, District- Muzaffarpur.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vipin Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 03-04-2017 Heard the parties.
The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Baruraj P.S.Case No.148 of 2015 registered for offences punishable under Sections147, 148, 149, 341, 342, 353, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that except the allegation that the petitioners were members of the mob, who were creating 'jam' of the road, there is nothing against the petitioners. They have no criminal antecedent.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances as stated above, let the petitioners, above named, in
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14821 of 2017 (2) dt.03-04-2017 2/2 the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri A.K. Tiwari, J.M. (West), Muzaffarpur in connection with Baruraj P.S.Case No.148 of 2015 subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioners shall co-operate in the investigation of the case and make themselves available as and when required by the Police, otherwise, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U