Patna High CourtCR. MISC./20992/2026bail rejected

Arun Bhagat @ Arun Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-05-06Mr. Justice Jitendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20992 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-523 Year-2025 Thana- UDWANTNAGAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Arun Bhagat @ Arun Kumar, S/o Mahesh Bhagat, R/o Village - Bampali, P.SUdwantnagar,Dist- Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Uma Kant Mishra, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 06-05-2026 Heard Ld. counsel for the petitioner and Ld. APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehend his arrest in connection with Udwantnagar P.S. Case No. 523 of 2025 dated 26.10.2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2), 352(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. As per allegation, the Petitioner along with the coaccused have repeatedly assaulted the victim, causing grievous injury.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the allegation against the Petitioner is general and omnibus in nature. He also submits that the Informant and the Petitioner's side are agnates and there is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20992 of 2026(3) dt.06-05-2026 2/2 property dispute between both the sides.

5. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the petition that petitioner has never moved before this Hon'ble Court for grant of Anticipatory Bail or Regular one.

6. It has also been stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents.

7. However, Ld. APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer of the petitioner for anticipatory bail.

8. Considering the grievous nature of injury, I am not persuaded to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail.

9. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner stands rejected.

10. At this stage, learned counsel for the Petitioner prays that the Petitioner may be allowed to surrender before the Court below and learned Trial Court may be directed to entertain his surrender cum bail petition on the same day of the filing of the same.

11. Learned trial court is requested to consider the regular bail application of the Petitioner on the same day of its filing, if filed.

(Jitendra Kumar, J.) Chandan/- U T