← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/6170/2011dfd for non appearance

Ram Shresta Sharma v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-06-23Mr. Justice Birendra Prasad Verma1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6170 of 2011 ====================================================== Ram Shresta Sharma, son of late Basudeo Sharma, Shyam Mills, At&P.O., P.S.-Narpatganj 854335 Subdivision Araria District-Araria. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Environment & Forest Department, Govt. of Bihar Sinchai Bhawan, Patna-800015.

2. The Divisional Commissioner, Purnea Division, At & P.O., P.S. & District-Purnea 854301 and the Chairman, Saw Mills Selection Committee Araria District.

3. The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Bihar, Technical Bhawan, Bailey Road, P.O.-Patna Secretariat, Patna-800015

4. The Regional Chief Conservator of Forest, At & P.O.-Bhagalpur.

5. The Conservator of Forests, Purnia Forest Circle, At & P.O., P.S., District-Purnia-85430

6. The Divisional Forest Officer, Araria Forest Division, P.O.-Araria 854301 and Member Secretary Saw Mills Selection Committee Araria District .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Manoj Kr. Ambasta, GP-14 Mr.Subodh Kumar, AC to GP-14 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 23-06-2015 Despite repeated calls, none appears on behalf of the petitioner in support of the present writ petition. However, learned State counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, by referring to the averments made in para 5 of the counter affidavit filed on their behalf, submits that against the impugned order, the petitioner has an alternative and efficacious remedy of appeal before the learned Sessions Judge, Araria. Without exhausting the aforesaid statutory remedy of appeal, the present writ petition filed before this Court is liable to be dismissed on that ground alone. Be that as it may, since none is appearing on behalf of the petitioner, the present writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.

Arvind/- (Birendra Prasad Verma, J) U