← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/2280/2015dismissed

Syed Mohammad Fahimuddin Ashraf v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-08-31Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2280 of 2015 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 23154 of 2012 ======================================================

1. Syed Mohammad Fahimuddin Ashraf Son of Late Md. Naimuddin Resident of Mohalla - Saharsa Basti, Ward No. 31, Saharsa, P.S. + District - Saharsa, at present working as Laboratory Incharge, Department of Botany, M.L.T., Saharsa College, Saharsa .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resource Development, Government of Bihar, Patna namely Sri R.K. Mahajan

2. The B.N. Mandal University, Madhepura through its Registrar, namely Sri Kumaresh Prasad Singh

3. The Vice-Chancellor, B.N. Mandal University, Madhepura, namely Sri Binod Kumar

4. The Registrar, B.N. Mandal University, Madhepura, namely Sri Kumaresh Prasad Singh

5. The Finance Officer, B.N. Mandal University, Madhepura, namely Sri H.P. Singh

6. The Principal, M.L.T., Saharsa College, Saharsa, namely Sri K.P. Yadav .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Mishra For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sc4 Md. Raisul Haque ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 31-08-2016 Heard Mr. Pramod Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The application alleges willful/deliberate disobedience/disregard of the order dated 15.01.2015 passed in CWJC 23154 of 2012 (Annexure-2).

On going through the aforesaid order, it appears no direction was issued to the respondents. In fact, the Court noticed

Patna High Court MJC No.2280 of 2015 (2) dt.31-08-2016 2/2 that the application has become infructuous.

Mr. Mishra, the counsel for the petitioner, states that he does not wish to press this application seeking liberty to the petitioner to raise his grievance before the appropriate authority/forum in accordance with law.

In view of aforesaid, the contempt proceeding is dropped.

(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) singh/- U