Binod Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16141 of 2011 ====================================================== Binod Kumar Singh , son of Paltan Singh ,resident of Village- Badalpura, Police Station - Chapra Mufassil, District- Saran At Chapra, Bihar .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar
2. The Principal Secretary General Administration Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna
3. The District Magistrate-Cum-Chairman Selection Committee, Saran At Chapra
4. The District Magistrate, Saran At Chapra
5. The Deputy Collector, Nazarat, Saran At Chapra
6. The Employment Exchange Officer, Saran, Chapra .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satish Chandra Jha-3 For the Respondent/s : Mr. Uday Saran Shankar Singh, GP 19 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 27-10-2016 Heard Sri Satish Chandra Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Uday Saran Shankar Singh, learned GP No. 19. The present writ petition was filed with a prayer initially to quash advertisement no. 04 of 2011 issued by the Employment Officer, Sub Employment Exchange Office, Saran, Chapra whereby applications were invited through employment exchange for desired candidates for preparation of panel to be appointed on Class IV post.
It was admitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that during the pendency of the writ petition the said advertisement was cancelled and subsequent advertisement was
Patna High Court CWJC No.16141 of 2011 (7) dt.27-10-2016 2/2 published and even thereafter no proper step is being taken to finalize the panel.
Sri Uday Saran Shankar Singh, learned GP No. 19 on instruction submits that there is all possibility that within six months panel may be finalized.
In view of submission made by learned State Counsel there is no reason to keep the matter pending. The writ petition stands disposed of. Court expects that the State authority will abide with their stand. (Rakesh Kumar, J) Praful/- U