Kailash Thakur @ Prakash @ Netaji v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.37799 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -136 Year- 2015 Thana -SHEOHAR District- SHEOHAR ====================================================== Kailash Thakur @ Prakash @ Netaji, Son of Raman Thakur, resident of village & P.S. Purnahiya, District Sheohar .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr.
For the Opposite Party : Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 20-09-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel representing the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sheohar P.S Case No. 136 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 385, 387, 504 of the Indian Penal Code. From perusal of the impugned order it would appear that except confessional statement of co-accused as well as criminal antecedent of the petitioner their appears to be nothing against him moreover, the petitioner in jail custody since 11.01.2016 whereas co-accused Vikash Kuamr @ Vikash Patel @ Vikash Kumar Raut has been allowed bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 18968 of 2016 by another co-ordinate Bench of this Court.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37799 of 2016 (2) dt.20-09-2016 2/2 In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sheohar, in connection with Sheohar P.S. Case No. 136 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the Court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Rajiv/- U T