Vijay Shankar Giri v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22367 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-288 Year-2021 Thana- BAIKUNTHPUR District- Gopalganj ====================================================== 1.

VIJAY SHANKAR GIRI Son of Rama Giri Resident of Village - Bhagwatpur, P.s.- Taraiya, Distt.- Saran.

2.

Vidyavati Devi W/o Rajesh Giri Resident of Village - Bhagwatpur, P.s.- Taraiya, Distt.- Saran.

3.

Rama Giri Son of Bhola Giri Resident of Village - Bhagwatpur, P.s.- Taraiya, Distt.- Saran.

4.

Rajesh Giri Son of Nimai Giri Resident of Village - Bhagwatpur, P.s.- Taraiya, Distt.- Saran.

5.

Mala Devi W/o Vijay Shankar Giri Resident of Village - Bhagwatpur, P.s.- Taraiya, Distt.- Saran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Naresh Chandra Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Murli Dhar, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 07-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 120B, 304B, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and petitioner No. 1 is maternal uncle of the informant, petitioner No. 2 is motherin-law of the informant, petitioner No. 3 is father of petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22367 of 2022(2) dt.07-11-2022 2/2 No. 1, petitioner No. 4 is father-in-law of the informant and petitioner No. 5 is wife of petitioner No. 1. The learned counsel submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that the dispute is between the informant and her husband but the entire family members have been implicated with general and omnibus allegation. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Baikunthpur P.S. Case No. 288 of 2021 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) HarshPandey/- U T