Patna High CourtCWJC/9165/2011disposed

Radhika Harijan v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-02-01Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9165 of 2011 ====================================================== Radhika Harijan son of Late Dhukhan Harijan , resident of village - Bari Bisahar P.O & P.S - Barahat , District - Banka .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary , Primary Education Department , Government Of Bihar , Patna

3. The Director, Primary Education , Bihar , Patna

4. The District Superintendent Of Education , Banka

5. The Block Education Officer , Barahat , District - Banka

6. The Area Education Officer , Barahat , Banka .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Nurul Hoda For the Respondent/s : AC to AAG 6 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 01-02-2016 After some argument, Sri Satish Chandra Mishra, learned counsel, who was assisted by Mr. Md. Nurul Hoda, learned counsel for the petitioner, in presence of learned AC to AAG No. 6 makes a prayer for disposal of the writ petition so that the petitioner may file a detailed representation before respondent no. 3 regarding the reliefs sought for in the present writ petition. Considering the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the court proposes to dispose of the writ petition granting liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed representation before the respondent no. 3 in respect of the reliefs sought for in the present writ petition with supporting documents. If such

Patna High Court CWJC No.9165 of 2011 (6) dt.01-02-2016 2/2 representation is filed within a period of eight weeks from today, the court expects that the respondent no. 3/ Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna may examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law preferably within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. Even in case of refusal of the claim, the respondent no. 3 is required to pass a reasoned order and communicate the same to the petitioner within the aforesaid time. (Rakesh Kumar, J) Praful/- U