Rajesh Paswan @ Amit Raj And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.67987 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-349 Year-2018 Thana- GRIYAK District- Nalanda ======================================================

1. Rajesh Paswan @ Amit Raj Son of Ram Balak Paswan Resident of Village-Sakuchi Saray P.S. Gireyak,Distt.-Nalanda

2. Deepu Malakar @ Teepu Malakar Son of Sadan Bhagat, Resident of Village-Sakuchidih P.S. Katri Saray,Distt.-Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar Pathak For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Kumar Virendra Narayan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 29-11-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Giriyak P.s.Case no.349 of 2018 registered for offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66 of the I.T. Act. Allegation as per FIR is that the police received information that some miscreants are indulged in cheating the local persons on the plea of getting prize and on that information the police raided there and accused persons succeeded in fleeing away , however, the petitioner was arrested.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that nothing incriminating has been recovered from his possession and he is in custody since 10.9.2018.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.67987 of 2018(2) dt.29-11-2018 2/2 Heard learned A.P.P. also, who has opposed the prayer for bail stating that some money receipts were also recovered from the possession of the petitioner.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioners, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM-I, Nalanda in connection with Giriyak P.S.Case No.349 of 2018.. With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make themselves available as and when required by the court and in the event of failure to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed.

chn/- (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) U T