Prabhu Pal v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1112 of 2017 (2) dt.13-01-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.1112 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -336 Year- 2016 Thana -BARAUNI District- BEGUSARAI ====================================================== Prabhu Pal, son of late Kukhlal Pal @ Mukhlal Pal. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramchandra Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 13-01-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner is accused in connection with Barauni P.S. Case No. 336 of 2016 registered under Section 47(A) of the Excise Act.
The accusation is that on receiving secret information about carrying of illegal liquor, informant and other police officials reached at Rajendra Bridge where one Indica car was intercepted, from where, petitioner along with Akash Kumar and Bhola Choudhary, were apprehended. On search, 106 bottles, each containing 375 ml, Indian made foreign liquor was recovered. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 13.09.2016. It is further submitted that similarly situated co-
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1112 of 2017 (2) dt.13-01-2017 accused, Bhola Choudhary, has already been granted privilege of bail by this Court vide order dated 08.12.2016 passed in Criminal Misc. No. 53221 of 2016.
Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai, in connection with Barauni P.S. Case No. 336 of 2016. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relative of the petitioner.
(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T