Shakti Kumar @ Shakti Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22080 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-329 Year-2021 Thana- BHELDI District- Saran ====================================================== AMIT RAJ @ CHINTU SINGH Son of Sanjeev Kumar Singh Resident of Village - Molnapur, P.s.- Bheldi, Distt.- Saran at Chapra. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 22512 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-329 Year-2021 Thana- BHELDI District- Saran ====================================================== 1.
SHAKTI KUMAR @ SHAKTI SINGH Son of Mahesh Singh @ Mahesh Kumar Singh Resident of Village - Kuwari Ajam, P.S.- Bheldi, District - Saran at Chapra 2.
Prashant Shukla @ Prashant Kumar Shukla Son of Sanjay Shukla Resident of Village - Bhatha Sonaho, P.S.- Bheldi, District - Saran at Chapra 3.
Devanand Singh Son of Late Umesh Singh Resident of Village - Nautan Mathia, P.S.- Marhowrah, District - Saran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 22080 of 2022) For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ram Binod Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 22512 of 2022) For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ram Binod Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 29-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22080 of 2022(2) dt.29-09-2022 2/2 323, 324, 325, 379, 307, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegedly, it is a case of assault upon the informant due to which he sustained injury.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the main allegation of assault is against co-accused Ujjawal Singh and Kanhaiya Singh. He further submits that the injury sustained by the informant on fingers of right hand. Petitioners have clean antecedent.
Learned APP appearing for the State opposed the anticipatory bail.
Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Sushant Sagar, Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra/concerned Court in connection with Bheldi P.S. Case No. 329 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U T