The State Of Bihar And ORS v. M/S Chaudhary And Brothers, Proprietor Shri Sudhir Kumar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Revision No.176 of 2014 ======================================================
1. The State Of Bihar through the Secretary, Rural Works Department, "Vishweshwarraiya Bhawan", Bailey Road, Patna. 2.
The Engineer-in-Chief, Road Construction Department, "Vishweshwarraiya Bhawan", Bailey Road, Patna. 3.
The Chief Engineer-cum-Additional Commissioner-cum-Special Secretary, Rural Works Department, "Vishweshwarraiya Bhawan", Bailey Road, Patna.
4. The Additional Secretary, Rural Works Department, "Vishweshwarraiya Bhawan", Bailey Road, Patna.
5. The Chief Engineer-II, Rural Works Department, "Vishweshwarraiya Bhawan", Bailey Road, Patna.
6. The Superintending Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Circle, Saharsa.
7. The Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Division, Khagaria.
8. The Assistant Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Sub Division Maheshkhunt, District- Khagaria.
.... .... Respondents/ Petitioners
Versus
1. M/s Chaudhary & Brothers, Proprietor Shri Sudhir Kumar, son of Shri Achyutanand Achyut, resident of Village- Samaspur, Police Station - Maheshkhunt, District- Khagaria.
.... .... Petitioner/ Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Sharma For the Respondent/s : Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 04-05-2017 Heard the parties.
It is informed on behalf of the respondents that present civil revision has been preferred against the award dated 07.03.2014 passed in Reference Case No. 05 of 2012 by the Tribunal. It is also informed that opposite party had filed CWJC No. 12047 of 2014 for quashing the resolution bearing Memo No.
Patna High Court C.R. No.176 of 2014 (5) dt.04-05-2017 2/2 MU.A-2 Papu 1-159/06-5060/Patna dated 11.01.2007 through which the opposite party was blacklisted by the Government and while disposing of CWJC No. 12047 of 2014, a co-ordinate Bench of this court vide judgment dated 17.11.2014 quashed the award dated 07.03.2014 (wrongly mentioned as 07.03.2004 in judgment dated 17.11.2014 passed in CWJC No. 12047 of 2014) and remitted the matter back to the Tribunal for a fresh decision. It is submitted that in the aforesaid circumstance, this civil revision petition has become infructuous.
In view of the aforesaid submission as well as taking note of judgment dated 17.11.2014 passed in CWJC No. 12047 of 2014, this civil revision petition stands disposed of being infructuous.
(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) SHAHZAD/- U