Deepak Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.69579 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-154 Year-2018 Thana- KURTHA District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Deepak Kumar Son of late Baleshwar Paswan Resident of Village- Dhamaul, P.S. Kurtha, District- Arwal.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Atul Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Kumar Ranjit Ranjan (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 06-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Kurtha P.S. Case No. 145 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Section 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is that he was apprehended with a stolen motorcycle.

It has been submitted that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner had purchased the motorcycle and he had no knowledge that motorcycle is a stolen motorcycle. He has no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 27.08.2018. Considering the aforesaid fact and circumstances of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.69579 of 2018(2) dt.06-12-2018 2/2 the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Arwal, in connection with Kurtha P.S. Case No. 154 of 2018 subject to conditions:

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by Court and their absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Rajiv/Manoj U T