← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./23215/2019disposed

Amarnath Kumar @ Amar Bhagat v. The State Of Bihar

2019-07-22Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 23215 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-480 Year-2017 Thana- VAISALI COMPLAINT CASE DistrictVaishali ====================================================== AMARNATH KUMAR @ AMAR BHAGAT Son of Late Mahendra Bhagat Resident of Village - Bairiya, Kolhua Paigambarpur, P.S.- Ahiyapur, District - Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.

Kumari Punam Wife of Amarnath Kumar Daughter of Shrawan Das, Resident of Village - Kanti Math, P.S.- Lalganj, District - Vaishali. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Abhay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Bharat Lal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 22-07-2019 Learned counsel for both the parties are present. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will visit the house of the informant within three weeks from today to bring her back to the matrimonial home. Learned counsel for the Opposite Party No. 2 agrees that on the petitioner's visiting her place, she will definitely accompany him and will lead a dignified life with him. In the aforesaid view of the matter, this application is being disposed of in terms of the amicable understanding between the parties.

In case of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioner above named be released

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 23215 of 2019(3) dt.22-07-2019 2/2 on bail on furnishing of bail bond of Rs. 15,000/- (fifteen thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Hazipur, Vaishali in connection with Complaint Case No. 480 of 2017, Tr. No. 2767 of 2018, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. Apart from that condition, this Court would also impose a condition that in case the petitioner fails to visit the place of opposite party no. 2 within the aforesaid three weeks and did not abide by his promise to bring back her to her matrimonial home, opposite party no. 2 shall apply to the court below for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. The court below shall pass appropriate order thereon within two weeks after filing of the application.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) avin/- U T