Patna High CourtCWJC/20674/2014disposed

Geeta Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-02-22Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran1 pages

Patna High Court CWJC No.20674 of 2014 (2) dt.22-02-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20674 of 2014 ====================================================== Geeta Devi, wife of Sri Krishna Yadav, resident of village-Narayan Bigha, P.O. Sakari Khurd, P.S. Parasi, District-Arwal, presently Chairman of Zila Parishad, Arwal, P.O., P.S. and District-Arwal .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna

2. The Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

3. The Director, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

4. The District Magistrate, Arwal, District-Arwal

5. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Arwal-cum-Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Arwal, P.O., P.S. and District-Arwal

6. Smt. Shobha Devi, wife of Sri Sanjay Paswan, presently Vice Chairman, Zila Parishad, Arwal, P.O., P.S. and District-Arwal

7. Sri Ram Kumar Sinha, son of not known to the petitioner

8. Sri Rabindra Singh, son of not known to the petitioner

9. Smt. Kalpana Kumari, wife of not known to the petitioner

10. Sri Sushil Kumar, son of not known to the petitioner

11. Sri Dilip Kumar Rajak, son of not known to the petitioner

12. Sri Niraj Sharma, son of not known to the petitioner

13. Smt. Champa Devi, wife of not known to the petitioner Respondent nos. 7 to 13 are the Members of Zila Parishad, Arwal, through the Deputy Development Commissioner-cum-Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Arwal, P.O., P.S. and DistrictArwal .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Chandan, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Smt. Binita Singh, G.P.-31 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 22-02-2016 Counsel for the parties are present.

Mr. S.B.K. Manglam, counsel for the petitioner submits that by passage of time, the matter has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of accordingly.

(Jyoti Saran, J) deepika/- U