← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./22374/2022allowed

Uday Chaudhary @ Uday Chaudhari v. The State Of Bihar

2022-11-07Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22374 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-434 Year-2021 Thana- FATEHPUR District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

UDAY CHAUDHARY @ UDAY CHAUDHARI Son of Late Butta Chaudhary @ Late Rajendra Chaudhary Resident of Village - Jamheta, P.S.- Fatehpur, Distt.- Gaya.

2.

Anil Chaudhary Son of Late Butta Chaudhary @ Late Rajendra Chaudhary Resident of Village - Jamheta, P.S.- Fatehpur, Distt.- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manish Kumar No2, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Braj Kishore Pd.(App), A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 07-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 353 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The informant alleges that while he was on field duty, accused Uday, Anil and Manish abused and assaulted him with fist and slaps on the ground that he helped the police in seizure of liquor.

Learned counsel submits that petitioner No. 1 has antecedent of two cases and petitioner No. 2 has antecedent of one case. Learned counsel further submits that petitioners have

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22374 of 2022(2) dt.07-11-2022 2/2 been falsely implicated in the present case at the behest of the informant who is Chowkidar, it is also submitted that since they are on an inimical term with the informant as such with a general and omnibus allegation, the petitioners were implicated, it is next submitted that no injury was even suffered by the informant.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Fatehpur P.S. Case No. 434 of 2021 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) HarshPandey/- U T