Munna Khan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.72760 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-142 Year-2018 Thana- HASPURA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Munna Khan, Son of Ali Imam Khan @ Alemam Khan, Resident of VillageBaijalpur, P.S.- Uphara, District- Aurangabad (Bihar). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Md. Nurul Hoda For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Amitesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 12-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in Haspura P.S. Case No. 142 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 467, 468 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

Informant has alleged that accused had taken Rs. 70,000/- to get sanctioned loan of Rs. 5 Lacs from the Bank for which he was called on 25.06.2018 in Punjab National Bank and informed that the amount will be sanctioned on next date, then Informant and others caught hold of petitioner and brought him to the Police Station where FIR was registered. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Informant and accused are business partners and the matter has been compromised among them. Petitioner has got no criminal

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.72760 of 2018(2) dt.12-12-2018 2/2 antecedent and is in custody since 26.06.2018. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate1st Class, Daudnagar, Aurangabad in connection with Haspura P.S. Case No. 142 of 2018, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U