Subodh Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.68760 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-127 Year-2018 Thana- MANSI District- Khagaria ====================================================== Subodh Singh, S/o Late Deonarayan Singh, Resident of VillageDharamchak, P.S. Mansi, District- Khagaria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Binod Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Bhanu Pratap Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 29-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Mansi P.S. Case No. 127 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation against petitioner is of recovery of 32 litres of country made liquor from the field. Petitioner was not arrested on the spot. His name was disclosed by the apprehended accused and on his confession, petitioner has been implicated in this case. Petitioner has one antecedent in Excise Act and he is in custody since 24.09.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.68760 of 2018(2) dt.29-11-2018 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Sessions Judge-Iind-cum Spl. Judge, Excise Act, Khagaria, in connection with Mansi P.S. Case No. 127 of 2018 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T