← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18742/2017dismissed

Md. Sadre Alam @ Sadre Alam v. The State Of Bihar

2017-05-08Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18742 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -111 Year- 2015 Thana -PARIHAR District- SITAMARHI ======================================================

1. MD. SADRE ALAM @ SADRE ALAM Son of md. Shabir, Resident of Village-Ekdandi, P.S. Parihar, District-Sitamarhi. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Anisur Rahman For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 08-05-2017 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Parihar P.S. Case No. 111/2015, registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 307, 324 and 302 Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner that he along with other accused persons gave knife blow to the informant and her son due to which son of informant died.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case and as a matter of fact, he was not present at the place of occurrence rather he was at Delhi at the alleged time of occurrence. It has further been submitted that petitioner has no criminal antecedent, which has been stated on oath by learned counsel for the petitioner in para -3 of the bail

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18742 of 2017 (2) dt.08-05-2017 2/2 application.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the fact that there is direct allegation against the petitioner that he along with other accused persons gave knife blow to the informant and her son and due to the said blow, son of the informant died and prosecution witnesses have also supported this fact, as such, I am not inclined to grant petitioner the privilege of bail, his application for anticipatory bail is accordingly rejected.

Let petitioner surrender before the court below and make prayer for regular bail, which will be considered by the court below on the merit of the case, without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T