← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/14925/2015dismissed

Sarogini Sinha And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2023-02-22Mr. Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14925 of 2015 ====================================================== 1.

Sarogini Sinha Wife of Sri Krishna Ballabh Prasad resident of Village P.O. - Chhotaki Amwan, Police Station - Akbarpur in the district of Nawada. 2.

Krishna Ballabh Prasad Son of Late Rajendra Prasad Singh resident of Village P.O. - Chhotaki Amwan, Police Station - Akbarpur in the district of Nawada.

3.

Sanjay Kumar Son of Late Bachchu Singh resident of Village - Bhadokhara, Police Station - Muffasil in the district of Nawada. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Director, Primary Education, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The Regional Deputy Director, Magadh Division, Gaya. 5.

The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Nawada. 6.

The District Primary Teachers Promotion Committee through its Chairmancum-District Education Offic 7.

The District Education Officer, Nawada.

8.

The District Programme Officer, Establishment, Nawada. ... ... Respondent ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Madhukar Mishra, AC to SC16 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA ORAL ORDER 22-02-2023 Learned counsel for the respondent states that a counter-affidavit has been filed in the Registry day before yesterday.

Registry is directed to place the same on record. Further he points out that the relief claimed by the petitioners has already been granted as per annexure- A, wherein

Patna High Court CWJC No.14925 of 2015(4) dt.22-02-2023 2/2 the petitioners have submitted that they have already been granted the benefit of promotion.

In the result, the writ petition is found to have become infructuous. Accordingly the same is dismissed. (Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J) Gauravkr/- Item No. 64 U